>>53453I didn't call you deranged for wanting consistency.
In this thread, I pointed out that the current version of a post likely does have a unique value, it just isn't displayed like older versions. You ask why and I offer a possible explanation. You then conclude that I must be the admin in disguise. There is absolutely no rational connection between the exchange we had and the conclusion you drew. THAT is why I called you deranged.
Also, based on
>>53446 , it's clear that you're the same idiot in the Issues thread who has been calling anyone who slightly questions anything you say a kike/chink in a series of unhinged posts. That is also why I called you deranged.
And I stand by what I said: utterly deranged.